Warning: file_get_contents(http://geoip.nekudo.com/api/54.162.133.222): failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found in /var/www/html/sruti/catalog/controller/common/header.php on line 63 The Most Splendid Varnam Of All

The Most Splendid Varnam Of All

DANCE IS A MANY SPLENDOURED THING, BUT . . .

The Most Splendid Varnam Of All

There are two kinds of varna-s—tanavarnam and padavarnam. Tanavarna-s are generally sung, though eminent dancers like Yamini have taken up compositions like Viribonifor dance exposition. The paucity of the words in the libretto restricts the instance and the amount of abhinaya. In that celebrated case, the beauty of Bhairavi, as brought out by Viriboniin Ata tala, sought to justify Yamini's choice.

The padavarna-s on the other hand, have all the ingredients that call for, and give room to, the various aspects of dance that are to be showcased in the major item of the recital. Most of these are in Telugu, some in Tamil, and a few in Sanskrit and in Manipravalam, a concoction of Sanskrit and Malayalam. The last two categories are invariably confusing because the correct meaning of the text is very difficult to get at; and splitting of the words in different ways gives rise to various interpretations that can't be easily reconciled. Possibly therearevarna-s in Kannada too but they haven't surfaced in Madras. As yet.

Padma Subrahmanyam took a Meerabhajan and restructured it like a varnam, satisfying all the requirements of a varnam. There has been no comparable adaptation of Tyagarajakriti-s. Generally, Endaromahanubhavulu (Sri), Sadhinchene (Arabhi), Jagadunandukuraku (Nata) and the Tamil pasuramPachaimamalai(ragamalika) which are done in the place of a varnamand sometimes even announced as varna-s. Just because teermanam- s are sprinkled here and there, and the swara passages are inherent, these do not become varna-s. More importantly, they do not have the leisurely, evolutionary development of the raga and of the main theme. In some, the words fly by so quickly, at the pace pre-determined by the composer, that meaningful abhinayato them, either by expression or gesture, is not possible. Even if it is properly and synchronously performed by a dancer with prodigious capacity for speed, the audience will not be able to correlate the word with the deed and derive all that it should from the saidabhinaya.

But of course there are a fewvarna-s of exceptional melodic grace wedded with textual beauty. Of those that I have examined, Manavikaikonaradain Sankarabharanam/Adi, by Ponniah Pillai of the Tanjavur Quartet, is by far the most worthy, an exemplary synthesis of word, meaning, melody and swara.

No matter what is claimed, raga-s like Manohari, Mukulabharanam, Chittabhramari, Kafi, in which there are varna-s, cannot have the grandeur, grace and the textured substance or raga-s like Sankarabharanam, Anandabhairavi, Bhairavi, Husseini and Todi.

For example, the tune that has been devised for Mana.andthe swara patterns that have been strung together to form the muktayiswara, are unusually appealing. They form a sturdy base for the dance to quietly shimmer or boldly scintillate.

The teermanam-s, whatever their form as called forth by the nattuvanar-guru, do not disturb the flow of the meaning in this lyric. Finally, the text of the song is in chaste Telugu, Telugu that is correct in grammar and idiom. In some Telugu varna-s, the language is divided between words that are Telugu and grammar that is taken from Tamil. Some have words that mean little or nothing. A few have no stylistic cohesion, no logical coherence.Because the authors were writing in a language that wasn't their mother-tongue.

Of course, a good part of the problem is caused by the fact that the Telugu is transliterated into Tamil, which allows different interpretations with diametrically opposite meaning: palukaga(spoke), palukaka (without speaking); or dheera (valorous one), theera (to assuage). A contributory factor is the wrong pronunciation by the singers, wrong interpretation by the choreographers and dancers who do not have a chance to get at the correct text and proper meaning from the usual sources.

In this particular varnam, the fourth stanza, a piquantly beautiful one with two meanings (an intended embellishment: sleshalankara), is generally omitted. The excuse given is that it is too explicitly erotic. Fiddlesticks! Its sensuousness is that of an ingenue, delicate in fragrance, natural in suggestion.

Here's an antidote to all the ills. The correct text,transliterated into English.Word for word meaning, which sometimes makes for odd English. This is unavoidable as the dancer should know where the meaning of a phrase begins and when it changes. And a meaningful paraphrase.

Pallavi:Manavikaikonaradachakkanisami

Request in-hand take won't you beautiful lord

Won't you hear my request, beautiful Lord !

Anupallavi:Vinarasritanjapurinivelayu ma brihadeesa

Listen Tanjapuri-in manifesting great Brihadeesa !

Hear, great Brihadeesa residing at Tanjavur

Ninnuneranamminanunikkamugamadilona

You well believed-I truly (my) heart-in

Truly, I believed you, totally, sincerely

Charanam :Panchasarudidigo

Five-arrowed one here

Now the five-arrowed Cupid

MSS (Muktayiswarasahityam) (1) Sami nee sati dora ne kananuru

Lord your equal lord I see-cannot

Oh Lord,you have no equal

MSS (2) Panchasaruduviluvanchivirisaramuenchenura

Five-arrowed one bow-bending flower-arrow considering

Cupid, with his bow strung is picking up a flower arrow

Ikavanchanatagadura

Henceforth deceit right it isn't

You shouldn't disappoint me any more

MSS (3)Dharadhipatiyanidoradoralupogaderakavijanulu

Land-lord proclaiming chieftains etc. praised (you) poets

Chieftains and others proclaimed you as the king ; poets

erigedarakalushameladheeranapaikripajoopara

know you prejudice-why valiant one me-on compassion

show

know you for a patron, why bear a grudge, valiant one,

show

maruluminchenuranannugaikora

desires overflowing me hand-take

compassion, my desires are increasing accept me

MSS (4) Vemaruchilakalu (vemaruchilukalu) kalakalamani

Manytimes parrots (thousand Cupid's parrots) prattling

parrots (thousand Cupid's parrots)

palukaganenetutaludura

speaking I how tolerate

How can I bear the constant prattling of

Elaeevalanannelajagelasrilola

Why now me-to rule delay-why wealthy-one

O prosperous one, why do you tarry in accepting me

Neekidimerakadura

You-to proper not-it is

This isn't proper on your part

Kotimanmadhakara Nee sari sati lerani

Crore Cupid-as-beautiful your equal aren't there

Oh One as beautiful as a crore of Cupids, that you have

no equal

manchipatapaduchu

good song singing

singing eloquently

Sarasaksha nee kripanunapainileka

Lotus-eyed one your compassion me-on without

Beautiful eyed One ! Is it just not to show compassion

nyayamemieevagaluchaluelaneekumrokkera

Justice-what these ways enough why you-to I bow

Enough of your waywardness. Why do you continue that

way? I bow to you.

The first line is normally sung as 'chekora'. The original text says 'kaikora', which means the same thing. Though it is addressed to a god, Brihadeesa, it should not be done as a devotional but as a love song laced with devotion. That is, for the anupallavi, steadfast belief ('Did you not rush to the succour of another steadfast believer Markandeya?' can be shown as a sanchari), regular indulgence in daily pooja ritual can be shown for the second line after showing for the first, the greatness of the town, the hero conferring good fortune on it by choosing to reside there, his stature etc. Here for the sanchari, any episode pertaining to Siva, illustrating his beauty, valour, readiness to come to the aid of devotees can be shown.

Though there are no hard and fast rules, no sanchari-s are to be done for the pallavi. The pallavi can be divided into three parts, and any number of variations performed for these.

The first part can show the message being sent through a friend, a bird, and in Siva's case, through a deer (but not a serpent). Writing of a letter too. The second part can show how beautiful he is. But this should not contain any thing that has to be repeated later for 'ma brihadeesa' or 'kotimanmadhakara'. For the third part, various signs of being love-struck can be arranged in the proper ascending order. Seeing him.Struck by his looks.Thinking about him. Developing love and pining for him. Being put off by food and drink. Hating the moonlight and finding the proffered sandal-paste scorching. The singing of friends, the" playing of veena, bumblebees or koels sounding abhorrent. A sakhi or two also can be shown, trying to appease the heroine's pangs. There should be a gradual build-up of her torrid turmoil and torture in his absence.

The charanam can show the glory of Cupid, riding forth splendiferously on a parrot, with a bow made up of a bent sugarcane, a string of bumblebees, five different flower-tipped arrows, where they strike, what effects they have, that is, the cruelty with which he is treating the heroine. The fifth arrow is not shown as used, as it results in death; but only the fear of its effect.

For the first MSS. The idea that his equal cannot be found is best illustrated by the story of both Vishnu and Brahma turning into a boar and swan and trying in vain to find the root and tip of the Siva linga; or by the story of Tripura-dahana; or by his vanquishing of the deadly poison Halahala which couldn't be handled by anyone else.

MSS (2) should show the passion of the heroine. No need to repeat what has already been essayed for the charanam. And appealing to his sense of decency. 'I am such a vulnerable girl, shouldn't you be kind?' should be the note.

MSS(3) should be a brief paraphrase of all that has been shown earlier. Care should be taken not to repeat the same stances, even though the ideas and images that are sought to be conveyed and created may be the same.

MSS(4) is the clinching argument 'How can I bear this' is the first part. 'Why don't you come right now' is the second. The next two lines are again a quick, mercurial paraphrase of all that has been done earlier.

It must be remembered that in MSS(3) and MSS(4), lengthy sanchari-s should be avoided. As a matter of fact if sanchari-s aretaken to mean other stories interpolated, these should be done only in the anupallavi, charanam and MSS (1). In the following, variants of the same idea can be shown (this can be done in the earlier part too).

As the song progresses, the delineation should be quicker which is not to be confused with quickening the pace of the song. It should be remembered that two minutes of a particular snatch of abhinaya done at the beginning of the song will seem like thirty seconds, and at the end of the piece, like five minutes. This is no reflection on the dancer or choreography but on the law of diminishing returns that applies.

The final denouement for the last two lines, should be a joyous assumption that he is going to fulfil the heroine's longing. It should never be ended with 'suffering in your absence' kind of a grimace. If done expertly, the audience must think that Brihadeeswarais already in the wings waiting to embrace the heroine on her exit.

When I think of this varnam, I can't but recall BharatanatyamKaraala's exquisite exposition of this magnificent piece some years ago at the Music Academy. She pulled it off so superbly that one could read love, longing, devotion, affection in that longing and find a surging release in her dance. If that isn't a many splendoured thing, what is?

Author

Top