Who’s who in Indian classical music Mudicondan Venkatarama
Mudicondan Venkatarama Iyer
(1887-1975)
Mudicondan is the name of one of
numerous villages in Tamil Nadu—notably
its cultural granary Tanjavur district—to be made
famous by Carnatic musicians or composers. Not only the recipient of the
highest honour in the field, the title of Sangita Kalanidhi, Venkatarama Iyer
of that hamlet was also known as the quintessential musician’s musician,
someone who illuminated the morning sessions of the Music Academy’s annual
conference with his scholarly lecture demonstrations. Yet his mastery of his
art extended beyond its lakshana aspects to embrace its lakshya aspects as
well.
Born to musically gifted parents—his father Chakrapani Iyer excelled in raga
elaboration and tevaram singing—on 15 October 1887, Venkatarama Iyer started
listening to Carnatic music and singing early in life, achieving considerable
prowess in raga alapana before he turned ten. Among the many stalwarts from
whom he imbibed his art were Konerirajapuram Vaidyanatha Iyer and
Ramanathapuram ‘Poochi’ Srinivasa Iyengar, listening to them both at home and
at weddings. His schooling at nearby Seerkazhi and distant Madras interrupted
by his father’s death, Venkataraman decided he would plunge into a career in
music rather than pursue an academic life.
Venkataraman’s music lessons began with Vedaranyam Swaminatha Iyer and
continued with Konerirajapuram Vaidyanatha Iyer and Ammachatram Kannuswamy
Pillai, from whom he learnt the laya intricacies he would one day integrate
successfully in his concert repertoire. Debuting as a vocalist at Cuddalore at
the age of 17, he lived on at Mudicondan except for an annual visit to Madras
during the December season. His first concert at Madras took place at the
Mylapore Sangeetha Sabha in 1919. It was not before 1948 that he actually
shifted to Madras, where he became principal of the Teachers’ College in 1956.
For this honour, he had the persistence of Dr V Raghavan, Secretary, Music
Academy, and his own sage counsel at the academic sessions of the annual
conference to thank. He had indeed made a huge impression on the delegates year
after year, with one particular demonstration of the Simhanandana tala standing
out for the Himalayan scope of his effort.
His manodharma in concert was sometimes likened to a limitless ocean, with the
accent on bhava and raga swarupa and not innovation or pleasing effect.
Tradition was paramount to him and he was a staunch believer in rendering
kritis in the original raga and as the composer composed them. Examples were
his insistence on the raga Abheri being sung with suddha dhaivatam, and the
kriti Nadatanumanisam in Chittaranjani of the Jhankaradhwani
janyam and not of the Kharaharapriya scale as later modified.
He was justly famous for his skills in tanam rendering and pallavi singing. He
did not overstress kanakku, though he was a master of laya. As
can be seen from the music of his disciples, R Vedavalli in particular, he
chose words for pallavi or niraval based on how meaningful or melodious they
were. They were often few in number and he sang them with much karvai. He
believed that pallavi should be “pleasing, emotional in content, spiritual in
satisfaction and intellectual in appeal.”
A lover of Hindustani music, Mudicondan admired the singing of Abdul Karim Khan
and Faiyaz Khan. A keen researcher, he was a collector of rare books on music.
In addition to his lectures at the Music Academy, he gave talks regularly for
All India Radio.
By V Ramnarayan
Posted by Sruti Magazine June 16, 2012
